<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Debate Topics and Participants </title>
        <link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/topic/7122/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ To summarise from the other thread, and to provide a handy visual guide to who is interested in what, a poll and new thread on debate topics and participants.
Expressing an interest at this stage in a particular theme does not commit you to participating in the debate.


Please elaborate on how you think a debate could be focused (eg to a narrower topic under one of these umbrellas) as well as if you are willing to take part in
a debate. If you are currently unwilling to commit to... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:21:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121629/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121629</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Wahrheitseeker wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <p>So the leading candidates are still tied up with 5 apiece.</p>

  <p>My hands are tied at the moment in regards to asking others to join in, for each topic would be deserving of a different set of participants.
  <br></p>
</blockquote>The essential prerequisite of a debate is to have two sides. Therefore, whichever topic could drum up more support from <span style="font-style: italic;">revisionists</span>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nickterry)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121629</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121623/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121623</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>So the leading candidates are still tied up with 5 apiece.</p>

<p>My hands are tied at the moment in regards to asking others to join in, for each topic would be deserving of a different set of participants.
<br>
  </p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Wahrheitseeker)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121623</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121586/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121586</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Hans wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I already voted for Auschwitz, but thinking of it a topic I really would like to see a debate with Revisionists on is the NS Euthanasia. I guess it scares
  them to death.
  <br>
</blockquote>You can probably guess that I would support this topic, too, as well as Third Reich legislation and actions against Jews and other &quot;social
outsiders&quot; during the &#39;30s. Despite my bitterness and humorless approach, I am... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KentFord9)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121586</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121582/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I already voted for Auschwitz, but thinking of it a topic I really would like to see a debate with Revisionists on is the NS Euthanasia. I guess it scares them
to death.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Hans)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121582</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:01:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121579/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121579</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I voted for the mass shootings, but would be up for taking part in any of the debates. I would just find the shooting-topic to be the most interesting.
<br>
<br>
On how to limit the debate and give it some parameters, perhaps discuss the scale and purpose of the alleged killings in the east.
<br>
<br>
On the AR camps, it would obviously be a similar theme to the old Auschwitz debate:
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  &quot;Resolved, at Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec, between 1942 and 1943: (a) people... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Wahrheitseeker)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121579</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121564/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121564</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">KentFord9 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">Jonathan Harrison wrote:</strong>
    <hr>
    8 votes so far but none by a revisionist.
  </blockquote>Maybe we should debate without &#39;em?
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
They pretty much &quot;debate&quot; without us in the Cesspit. So this really lays bare their demand for a full debate for the fraud that it is. I&#39;ve got
to give it to the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (deathonacracker)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121564</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:43:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121545/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121545</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">KentFord9 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">Jonathan Harrison wrote:</strong>
    <hr>
    8 votes so far but none by a revisionist.
  </blockquote>Maybe we should debate without &#39;em?
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
</blockquote>I feel that I can adequately debate as a revisionist if they don&#39;t show up, and I will volunteer to do so.
<br>
I am relatively weak in my reading and research background compared to most of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (pooshoodog)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121545</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121541/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121541</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Jonathan Harrison wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  8 votes so far but none by a revisionist.
</blockquote>Maybe we should debate without &#39;em?
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KentFord9)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121541</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121539/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121539</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 8 votes so far but none by a revisionist. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jonathan Harrison)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121539</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121526/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121526</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I voted for the AR camps. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (JanModus)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121526</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:10:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121525/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121525</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div style="text-align: left;">
  I voted for the open-air shootings. I would be in favor of any of the topics listed and would participate doing research, contributing ideas, and critiquing
  submissions, although my lack of starting knowledge of the postwar trials would necessarily limit my participation on that topic.
  <br>
</div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KentFord9)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121525</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/121524/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html#reply-121524</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For the record, if we were only holding One Big Debate, I would prefer the AR camps, but I am strongly in favour of organising two debates in parallel, one
perhaps on a smaller scale and narrower topic, to involve as many people as possible.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nickterry)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/121524</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Debate Topics and Participants  ]]></title>
			<link>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/topic/7122/t/Debate-Topics-and-Participants.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ To summarise from the other thread, and to provide a handy visual guide to who is interested in what, a poll and new thread on debate topics and participants.
Expressing an interest at this stage in a particular theme does <span style="font-style: italic;">not</span> commit you to participating in the debate.
<br>
<br>
Please elaborate on how you think a debate could be focused (eg to a narrower topic under one of these umbrellas) as well as if you are willing to take part in
a debate. If you... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (nickterry)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rodohforum.yuku.com/topic/7122</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>