| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
deathonacracker |
Take the F-Scale Test |
Lead | ||
|
Remember what Irma Grese said right after the trial? I'll remind you:
"It was our duty to exterminate anti-social elements, so that Germany's future would be assured."
Last Edited By: deathonacracker 5-Jun-2009 20:23.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Ignorantbystander |
#1 | |||
|
my score: 2.4
which makes me a liberal airhead by American standards so I guess pretty average for a (Dutch) European. |
||||
|
|
||||
Balmoral2 |
#2 | |||
|
2.3
|
||||
|
|
||||
KentFord9 |
#3 | |||
|
whining rotter
|
||||
|
|
||||
davidwoolfe |
#4 | |||
|
2.33
|
||||
|
|
||||
deathonacracker |
#5 | |||
|
Lots of "Liberal Airheads" in some members here! A couple of "whining rotters." Are the others afraid to take the test??
Mike
Remember what Irma Grese said right after the trial? I'll remind you:
"It was our duty to exterminate anti-social elements, so that Germany's future would be assured." |
||||
|
|
||||
davidwoolfe |
#6 | |||
deathonacracker wrote:Unfortunately, if someone wanted to prove a point, or disprove one, such as the case may be, it is pretty obvious that the further left or right you mark your answers... - Dave |
||||
|
|
||||
KentFord9 |
#7 | |||
|
You mean it's not scientifically validated? Crap . . . ;-p
|
||||
|
|
||||
nickterry |
#8 | |||
|
1.8
|
||||
|
|
||||
Wahrheitseeker |
#9 | |||
|
Geez, the first "normal" score of the bunch!
3.2 You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American
All the best,
W. |
||||
|
|
||||
Jonathan Harrison |
#10 | |||
|
2.33
|
||||
|
|
||||
Scott Smith 01 |
#11 | |||
|
"You are disciplined but tolerant; a true American." 3.3
I scored in the same "disciplined but tolerant" category as when I first posted this test at the Axis History Forum several years ago. The actual number may be slightly higher now because I am less tolerant of Slackers than I used to be. (I am happy they are away at Mommy and Daddy's for the Summer right now.) I'm also more upset about public officials these days.
In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Christian Identity Pastor Sheldon Emry wrote:
"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which
accounts for Germany's
startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the bankers." I'm an atheist and disagree with the ideology that "Fighting the Joos" is the answer for all social problems, even if I do have a strong distaste for the corrupt Holocaust/Zionist Lobby─but I like the politico-economic insight quoted above, which explains WWII in a nutshell that any stupid Gentile can understand. Compare Weimar Germany and the Federal Reserve Banking System today, with trillions of dollars in interest-bearing government and "Bankster" debt that is underwritten by the U.S. taxpayer.
Last Edited By: Scott Smith 01 6-Jun-2009 17:22.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Balmoral2 |
#12 | |||
Scott Smith 01 wrote:"tolerant": It's a good thing there weren't any specific questions about black folks, Mr. Smith... |
||||
|
|
||||
deathonacracker |
#13 | |||
davidwoolfe wrote: Smart guy. Maybe I selected the wrong site, but I wanted it to be obvious. Mike Mike
Remember what Irma Grese said right after the trial? I'll remind you:
"It was our duty to exterminate anti-social elements, so that Germany's future would be assured." |
||||
|
|
||||
Philip Mathews |
#14 | |||
|
2.1
“They
(Allies) accepted the HGCs (Holocaust Gas Chambers)
uncritically because they authored these
lies.”
Scott Smith’s Conspiracy www.jewishgen.org/ForgottenCamps/Exhib/HowtoEngl.html |
||||
|
|
||||
nexgen586 |
#15 | |||
|
I'm a Liberal airhead
2.7333333333333334 apparently.
Mr. K0nsl, thank you for removing your signature!
Mr. K0nsl, thank you for removing your signature! Mr. K0nsl, thank you for removing your signature! |
||||
|
|
||||
deathonacracker |
#16 | |||
Balmoral2 wrote: Well, tolerance isn't necessarily a good thing. Philosophically, tolerance means that you really don't like "them", but you won't impead their existance. Say it is Catholics tolerating Protestants. Well they can tolerate them, but they don't have to give them a public place to worship. Also, the psychology of a genocide capable personality is interesting in Baum's book. I'll get into more of that when the thread appears done. Mike
Remember what Irma Grese said right after the trial? I'll remind you:
"It was our duty to exterminate anti-social elements, so that Germany's future would be assured." |
||||
|
|
||||
KentFord9 |
#17 | |||
|
I was a friggin' 1.5, sheesh. Sometimes I really don't know.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Hans |
#18 | |||
|
2,33333. And happy it's below the average US American (so much on tolerance...).
|
||||
|
|
||||
little grey rabbit |
#19 | |||
|
3.6.
Basically its a test which validates the personal prejudices of its designers
Shlomo Venezia's dry wit: "If I pass a brick factory, it can remind me of the crematoriums"
|
||||
|
|
||||
deathonacracker |
#20 | |||
little grey rabbit wrote: Most psychological tests have many more questions and are disordered. They tend to verify answers by asking questions in several different ways. I'm positive you have a CT concerning the test so that will fit you right in. It's good to see that Scott did this test in the past and maybe he found a better page, but time is limited and I'm sure you were honest. I'll pull out the article and see just who would be rescuers, bystanders, or perpeatrators. Those who thought that children should show respect and obedience to authority should realize that children rebel against this authority at some point in their lives. Within boundaries this is a good thing and as long as it is within boundaries it should be understood and not outlandishly punished. It seems that the perpetrator personality is learned from perpetrator type parents. The question on bad manners, habits, and breeding is a suggestion of judgement. If one is going to judge bad manners and breeding in others what is one judging? Especially as this applies to the question above. There are obvious asocial behaviors such as needing a bath, but those people on the streets, are they all just bums? The country needs, other than laws, is a few courageous, tireless, devoted in whom people can put their faith. Other than laws?? What does "faith" mean in the usage? I should have put this thread in the denial section for if it isn't destroyed a discussion could begin. Mike
Remember what Irma Grese said right after the trial? I'll remind you:
"It was our duty to exterminate anti-social elements, so that Germany's future would be assured." |
||||
|
|
||||