Yuku free message boards

My Recent Posts · 28-Apr-2008

Tags : None

Posted on Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:46 am :

You must have keyed in the name of a hatemongering site which has:

- posted personal threats against Revisionists
- a la 'wanted' posters, posted supposed identification photos and addresses of Revisionists
- enaged in vulgar and violence laced language

When that site's name is posted here, the word 'shills' appropriately appears automatically.

shill:
one who poses as something they are not in a duplicitous manner

Many of their 'best' participants have posted repeatedly here. Since their arguments have been easily debunked, they resorted to their usual threats, spamming, dodging, and desperate obfuscation.

Read our guidelines
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=358

M1
_________________
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

Could it be that the "Moderator" is too dumb to realize the self-defeating irony of his custom signature, which results from the fact that shielding "Revisionist" crap from debate is exactly what CODOH-style "debunking" (read: deleting or retaining inconvenient posts and banning inconvenient posters) and keeping the flock from looking through the RODOH telescope are all about?

My Recent Posts · 28-Apr-2008

I for one, and I am not even a 'revisionist', have been the victim of RODOH-tactics which include the gathering of ones personal details; addresses; phone numbers and other personal information along with horrendous misrepresentation since the year 2004.
This is true whether Roberto likes to deny it or not. They have also conveniently deleted most of the threads which dealt with such things, they blame it on the "upgrade process". In any case, it is quite clear what would happen to a gifted revisionist had he or she been their victim. I am merely an amateur writer on the subject and I simply do not believe in the mandated junk-story which the jews puke about at every opportunity they receive. This was enough to target this writer in the most despicable manner one can imagine.
So stay clear of this place if you have a decent job, a family and a profession that you care of, and least but not last, if you live in a country where it is illegal to deny their petty junk-story you should think more than twice about expressing your opinion here. Unless, of course, you are a fearless fighter for the truth - which I am.
I simply do not care what happens to myself because of disbelieving this junk. It just speaks volumes about what sort of people we are dealing with. They do not deal with history or fact, but intimidation, sophistry, obfuscation and awful deceit.

Faithfully,
"k0nsl"

My Recent Posts · 28-Apr-2008

k0nsl wrote:
They have also conveniently deleted most of the threads which dealt with such things, they blame it on the "upgrade process".

You really ought not to tell such obvious lies, k0nsl. Nothing was deleted. For those interested in your 'case' they can now read the entire sorry saga in one merged thread.

My Recent Posts · 28-Apr-2008

Nick Terry,
Don't be daft. Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions. That does not count, does it.
-k0nsl

My Recent Posts · 28-Apr-2008

The CODOH Moderator's explanation from the original post still does not explain why I am also banned from that forum.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

k0nsl wrote:
Nick Terry,
Don't be daft. Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions. That does not count, does it.
-k0nsl

On the contrary, I deleted nothing. The compilation thread has 679 posts in it. You may be right that it does not contain all discussion of the 'k0nsl question', but you can find that scattered throughout the entire forum. Only those threads that were addressed to you directly went into the compilation.

Your total post count through advanced search is 1323 vs 1333 listed. That's 10 missing.

It seems some of these date back to February 2005
http://rodohforum.yuku.com/topic/2781
which is a whole year before I was on this forum. And we have Andrew Mathis admitting to the deletions, too.

I deleted his posts on a single thread -- about 15 of them, I think (I didn't count) -- because he was not answering the questions, being deliberately obtuse, and being abusive. This was making the thread totally unmanageable. I offered him a new thread, and you see what he did with that.

So I think you should apologise for accusing me of something I did not do.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

Apologies to you is of no interest to myself and it never will be. I do not apologize to intellectual-terrorists.

Faithfully, and without apology,
"k0nsl"

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

k0nsl wrote:
Apologies to you is of no interest to myself and it never will be. I do not apologize to intellectual-terrorists.

Faithfully, and without apology,
"k0nsl"

It is childishness such as this, k0nsl, that makes you such a joke around these parts. Evidently you feel free to make up lies and then refuse to admit you were wrong, or apologise, when called on these lies. You do not have to grovel or say sorry, but an admission of being in the wrong is the least one should expect. Yes, I am going to force the issue because you clearly are in the wrong. You made up a fable and lied.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing. I feel the issue is over and done with as of now, because you and the other goons are satisfied with having gathered my personal information and other information irrelevant to the question of whether or not there were chemical slaughterhouses built by the Germans to exterminate, amongst others and mainly, Jews.
You did absolutely nothing as a Moderator to prevent this and therefore you are as guilty as your goons; Sergeyromanov, Xcalibur, Balmoral and Andrew E. Mathis to name a few.

Faithfully, and without any apology,
"k0nsl"

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

k0nsl wrote:
I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing.

Yes you did. You wrote "Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions." That is a lie. You have been called on it, and now you won't admit it, which is understandable, but extremely childish. Fine, if that's how things are in your world, then you have just shot your credibility to pieces for the umpteenth time.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

Oh, just to rub things in, here is what people are saying about you on other internet forums

Then you cite as references a who's who of crackpots, Nazis and anti-semites. You even cite k0nsl. Have you actually read his posts at RODOH? The guy is a dick - it makes you look about as credible as citing Killtown would.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

Hello again Nick Terry,
As for the record, it seems I am in the need of repeating myself; I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing. That is the bottom line, like it or not!

As for what other people are writing about myself, I could not be bothered any less, to be perfectly honest -- it is, though, a bit interesting that people have such a burning interest in my person.

The person, who seems to share the same level of intellegence and intellect as yourself, as it seems you share his opinion by your post a bit above mine, is illogical and unreasonable and quite deceitful; this is particularily noticeable when reading the post by your admirer:

Then you cite as references a who's who of crackpots, Nazis and anti-semites. You even cite k0nsl. You cite his website which links to - among other unsavoury sites - Stormfront. And you wonder why you're being called a Nazi (!?).

Obviously the person is a ignorant in a lot of respects and possibly a moron. If I link to a article on RODOH, or some other web page, with views I do not agree with or condemn, does that make myself a believer in the story of a "holocaust" where the main victims are said to have been Jews, and who are alleged to have been murdered with a pesticide in "chemical slaughterhouses", provisional bunkers and in underground morgues? No, obviously it does not.
So your friend, and yourself if you agree with him, are misinformed. This tactic of you intellectual-terrorists has a meaning; guilt by association - but in this case, the attack against the poster, had no association other than using a reference to my web page - and not to Stormfront or whatever web page I happen to link to.
This reasoning is illogical and in every essence completely wrong.

You really ought to go back to reviewing decadent music.

Faithfully, and boldly,
"k0nsl"

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

Hello again Nick Terry,
As for the record, it seems I am in the need of repeating myself; I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing. That is the bottom line, like it or not!

No, the bottom line is that you asserted ""Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions." This is untrue for the reasons explained. At the very least you made a mistake. At the very worst you are a liar. What is certain, is that your assertion is false.

Please explain your way out of this very simple issue, k0nsl.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

No, I don't need to. I have made everything clear and I don't play your games. Everybody with two eyes and the capability to read can see how you have aided and abetted in collecting information on my person -- something which is absolutely irrelevant in finding out what happened or did not happen to Jews in the year of 1942 and onwards.
We also got one other telling example of how your brain (de)function. Thank you kindly.
In any case, I consider this issue over and done with and this is all the time I currently have to spend on insignificants such as yourself.

Faithfully,

k0nsl

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

Nick Terry wrote:

Your total post count through advanced search is 1323 vs 1333 listed.

So what. It does not prove your point if you happen to think it does that. One or two weeks ago when I posted the date of my post was from the 1950s, do you believe I can travel in time, too?

-k0nsl

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

k0nsl wrote:
Nick Terry wrote:

Your total post count through advanced search is 1323 vs 1333 listed.

So what. It does not prove your point if you happen to think it does that. One or two weeks ago when I posted the date of my post was from the 1950s, do you believe I can travel in time, too?

-k0nsl

Yes, it proves my point, because you have lost just 10 posts on here compared to the displayed post-count. Contrast with Scott Smith, who has lost 1000 posts out of 13,500 or so during the life of the forum. The losses almost all come from un-archived threads during the ezBoard software era. ezBoard could only accomodate 20 pages of threads per forum, so unless they were archived, the threads disappeared when they ended up on 'page 21'. I don't have the power to alter post-counts, that is I think beyond even Scott as an owner.

And then we have a clear indicator, a link to an old thread, showing when the 10 posts were lost - in 2005. Before I was even a member or a moderator, and long before the changeover to Yuku.

But no, k0nsl cannot admit that he made a mistake.

And then he has the hypocrisy to demand that others' posts be deleted, while complaining that somehow we have apparently deleted his, when we have not.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

Nick Terry:

And then he has the hypocrisy to demand that others' posts be deleted, while complaining that somehow we have apparently deleted his, when we have not.

Please note that you have already acknowledged that the administration of this forum has deleted, at least, ten posts for this writer -- that we know of. So in this case, and most probably in a lot of others, you contradicted yourself.

Faithfully,

"k0nsl"

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

I also wonder what the reason is of the person you seem to admire who wrote that Stormfront is a "unsavoury" place. The question I ponder to myself is whether this is so because Stormfront , apparently, banned swastikas or if there is another underlining reason for this statement.
It ought to be noted that I only linked and visited Stormfront because of their section devoted to the junk-story you value so dearly. In every case, it must be said again, linking to a web page which contains the link to a web page you dislike or disagree with, does not make that person a "Nazi". This should be elementary understanding - but with "holocaust"-propagandists, enforcers and intellectual-terrorists the logic is reversed.

Faithfully,

"k0nsl"

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

k0nsl wrote:
Nick Terry:

And then he has the hypocrisy to demand that others' posts be deleted, while complaining that somehow we have apparently deleted his, when we have not.

Please note that you have already acknowledged that the administration of this forum has deleted, at least, ten posts for this writer -- that we know of. So in this case, and most probably in a lot of others, you contradicted yourself.

Faithfully,

"k0nsl"

Nope. 2008 is not 2005.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

k0nsl wrote:
I also wonder what the reason is of the person you seem to admire who wrote that Stormfront is a "unsavoury" place. The question I ponder to myself is whether this is so because Stormfront , apparently, banned swastikas or if there is another underlining reason for this statement.
It ought to be noted that I only linked and visited Stormfront because of their section devoted to the junk-story you value so dearly. In every case, it must be said again, linking to a web page which contains the link to a web page you dislike or disagree with, does not make that person a "Nazi". This should be elementary understanding - but with "holocaust"-propagandists, enforcers and intellectual-terrorists the logic is reversed.

Faithfully,

"k0nsl"

carry on burbling to yourself. You've been trolled.

My Recent Posts · 29-Apr-2008

Hm. That is not even funny.

-k0nsl

Author	Comment
Roberto	RODOH as defined by the Cesspit’s “Moderator”		Lead	[-]
Member Posts: 10109 28-Apr-2008 19:38	Tags : None Posted on Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:46 am : You must have keyed in the name of a hatemongering site which has: - posted personal threats against Revisionists - a la 'wanted' posters, posted supposed identification photos and addresses of Revisionists - enaged in vulgar and violence laced language When that site's name is posted here, the word 'shills' appropriately appears automatically. shill: one who poses as something they are not in a duplicitous manner Many of their 'best' participants have posted repeatedly here. Since their arguments have been easily debunked, they resorted to their usual threats, spamming, dodging, and desperate obfuscation. Read our guidelines http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=358 M1 _________________ Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it. Could it be that the "Moderator" is too dumb to realize the self-defeating irony of his custom signature, which results from the fact that shielding "Revisionist" crap from debate is exactly what CODOH-style "debunking" (read: deleting or retaining inconvenient posts and banning inconvenient posters) and keeping the flock from looking through the RODOH telescope are all about? Custom Signature *Quote:* Denial of generally known historical facts should not be punishable. For those who maintain, for instance, that Germany did not take part in World War I or that Adenauer fought at Issus in 333, their own stupidity is punishment enough. The same should apply to the denial of the horrors and crimes of the recent German past. ~ A German jurist by the name of Baumann in the German juridical magazine NJW, quoted in: Bailer-Galanda/Benz/Neugebauer (ed.), Die Auschwitzleugner, Berlin 1996, page 261 (my translation).
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#1	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1332 28-Apr-2008 20:07	I for one, and I am not even a 'revisionist', have been the victim of RODOH-tactics which include the gathering of ones personal details; addresses; phone numbers and other personal information along with horrendous misrepresentation since the year 2004. This is true whether Roberto likes to deny it or not. They have also conveniently deleted most of the threads which dealt with such things, they blame it on the "upgrade process". In any case, it is quite clear what would happen to a gifted revisionist had he or she been their victim. I am merely an amateur writer on the subject and I simply do not believe in the mandated junk-story which the jews puke about at every opportunity they receive. This was enough to target this writer in the most despicable manner one can imagine. So stay clear of this place if you have a decent job, a family and a profession that you care of, and least but not last, if you live in a country where it is illegal to deny their petty junk-story you should think more than twice about expressing your opinion here. Unless, of course, you are a fearless fighter for the truth - which I am. I simply do not care what happens to myself because of disbelieving this junk. It just speaks volumes about what sort of people we are dealing with. They do not deal with history or fact, but intimidation, sophistry, obfuscation and awful deceit. Faithfully, "k0nsl" I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#2	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6538 28-Apr-2008 20:48	k0nsl wrote: They have also conveniently deleted most of the threads which dealt with such things, they blame it on the "upgrade process". You really ought not to tell such obvious lies, k0nsl. Nothing was deleted. For those interested in your 'case' they can now read the entire sorry saga in one merged thread.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#3	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1333 28-Apr-2008 20:55	Nick Terry, Don't be daft. Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions. That does not count, does it. -k0nsl I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
Scott Smith 01		#4	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 13573 28-Apr-2008 23:56 humble, lovable shoeshine boy	The CODOH Moderator's explanation from the original post still does not explain why I am also banned from that forum. We are not here -- I do not believe we are -- to decide who acted with the greatest brutality against innocent, unarmed civilians, but to clear up the record and to make it clear that the "unique" brutality of the Germans is a myth exploited obsessively throughout American culture for the political, social, and economic benefit of those who benefit from it. This is why we are forwarding the idea of an open debate on the matter, to break the taboo that forbids a real examination of the "unique monstrosity" of the Germans, which will, hopefully, lead to a public awareness and a back and forth on the issues we find [...] There is a tendency among revisionists, because of the stupid, one-sided history of WWII that has been institutionalized by our intellectual and political classes, to argue that the Germans are innocent of all wrong doing. I do not believe that can be demonstrated. ~ Bradley R. Smith 3/27/2008 ONE NAME, WITH PROOF http://bradleysmithsblog.blogspot.com
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#5	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6540 29-Apr-2008 08:50	k0nsl wrote: Nick Terry, Don't be daft. Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions. That does not count, does it. -k0nsl On the contrary, I deleted nothing. The compilation thread has 679 posts in it. You may be right that it does not contain all discussion of the 'k0nsl question', but you can find that scattered throughout the entire forum. Only those threads that were addressed to you directly went into the compilation. Your total post count through advanced search is 1323 vs 1333 listed. That's 10 missing. It seems some of these date back to February 2005 http://rodohforum.yuku.com/topic/2781 which is a whole year before I was on this forum. And we have Andrew Mathis admitting to the deletions, too. I deleted his posts on a single thread -- about 15 of them, I think (I didn't count) -- because he was not answering the questions, being deliberately obtuse, and being abusive. This was making the thread totally unmanageable. I offered him a new thread, and you see what he did with that. So I think you should apologise for accusing me of something I did not do.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#6	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1335 29-Apr-2008 09:26	Apologies to you is of no interest to myself and it never will be. I do not apologize to intellectual-terrorists. Faithfully, and without apology, "k0nsl" I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#7	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6541 29-Apr-2008 09:42	k0nsl wrote: Apologies to you is of no interest to myself and it never will be. I do not apologize to intellectual-terrorists. Faithfully, and without apology, "k0nsl" It is childishness such as this, k0nsl, that makes you such a joke around these parts. Evidently you feel free to make up lies and then refuse to admit you were wrong, or apologise, when called on these lies. You do not have to grovel or say sorry, but an admission of being in the wrong is the least one should expect. Yes, I am going to force the issue because you clearly are in the wrong. You made up a fable and lied.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#8	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1336 29-Apr-2008 09:54	I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing. I feel the issue is over and done with as of now, because you and the other goons are satisfied with having gathered my personal information and other information irrelevant to the question of whether or not there were chemical slaughterhouses built by the Germans to exterminate, amongst others and mainly, Jews. You did absolutely nothing as a Moderator to prevent this and therefore you are as guilty as your goons; Sergeyromanov, Xcalibur, Balmoral and Andrew E. Mathis to name a few. Faithfully, and without any apology, "k0nsl" I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#9	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6542 29-Apr-2008 10:14	k0nsl wrote: I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing. Yes you did. You wrote "Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions." That is a lie. You have been called on it, and now you won't admit it, which is understandable, but extremely childish. Fine, if that's how things are in your world, then you have just shot your credibility to pieces for the umpteenth time.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#10	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6543 29-Apr-2008 10:18	Oh, just to rub things in, here is what people are saying about you on other internet forums Then you cite as references a who's who of crackpots, Nazis and anti-semites. You even cite k0nsl. Have you actually read his posts at RODOH? The guy is a dick - it makes you look about as credible as citing Killtown would.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#11	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1337 29-Apr-2008 11:11	Hello again Nick Terry, As for the record, it seems I am in the need of repeating myself; I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing. That is the bottom line, like it or not! As for what other people are writing about myself, I could not be bothered any less, to be perfectly honest -- it is, though, a bit interesting that people have such a burning interest in my person. The person, who seems to share the same level of intellegence and intellect as yourself, as it seems you share his opinion by your post a bit above mine, is illogical and unreasonable and quite deceitful; this is particularily noticeable when reading the post by your admirer: Then you cite as references a who's who of crackpots, Nazis and anti-semites. You even cite k0nsl. You cite his website which links to - among other unsavoury sites - Stormfront. And you wonder why you're being called a Nazi (!?). Obviously the person is a ignorant in a lot of respects and possibly a moron. If I link to a article on RODOH, or some other web page, with views I do not agree with or condemn, does that make myself a believer in the story of a "holocaust" where the main victims are said to have been Jews, and who are alleged to have been murdered with a pesticide in "chemical slaughterhouses", provisional bunkers and in underground morgues? No, obviously it does not. So your friend, and yourself if you agree with him, are misinformed. This tactic of you intellectual-terrorists has a meaning; guilt by association - but in this case, the attack against the poster, had no association other than using a reference to my web page - and not to Stormfront or whatever web page I happen to link to. This reasoning is illogical and in every essence completely wrong. You really ought to go back to reviewing decadent music. Faithfully, and boldly, "k0nsl" I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#12	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6544 29-Apr-2008 11:20	Hello again Nick Terry, As for the record, it seems I am in the need of repeating myself; I am not in the wrong and I lied about nothing. That is the bottom line, like it or not! No, the bottom line is that you asserted ""Everything is most certainly not included in the Mathis-thread, there only a smidgen is included; your own selective inclusions." This is untrue for the reasons explained. At the very least you made a mistake. At the very worst you are a liar. What is certain, is that your assertion is false. Please explain your way out of this very simple issue, k0nsl.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#13	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1339 29-Apr-2008 11:28	No, I don't need to. I have made everything clear and I don't play your games. Everybody with two eyes and the capability to read can see how you have aided and abetted in collecting information on my person -- something which is absolutely irrelevant in finding out what happened or did not happen to Jews in the year of 1942 and onwards. We also got one other telling example of how your brain (de)function. Thank you kindly. In any case, I consider this issue over and done with and this is all the time I currently have to spend on insignificants such as yourself. Faithfully, k0nsl I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#14	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1341 29-Apr-2008 12:11	Nick Terry wrote: Your total post count through advanced search is 1323 vs 1333 listed. So what. It does not prove your point if you happen to think it does that. One or two weeks ago when I posted the date of my post was from the 1950s, do you believe I can travel in time, too? -k0nsl I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#15	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6546 29-Apr-2008 12:32	k0nsl wrote: Nick Terry wrote: Your total post count through advanced search is 1323 vs 1333 listed. So what. It does not prove your point if you happen to think it does that. One or two weeks ago when I posted the date of my post was from the 1950s, do you believe I can travel in time, too? -k0nsl Yes, it proves my point, because you have lost just 10 posts on here compared to the displayed post-count. Contrast with Scott Smith, who has lost 1000 posts out of 13,500 or so during the life of the forum. The losses almost all come from un-archived threads during the ezBoard software era. ezBoard could only accomodate 20 pages of threads per forum, so unless they were archived, the threads disappeared when they ended up on 'page 21'. I don't have the power to alter post-counts, that is I think beyond even Scott as an owner. And then we have a clear indicator, a link to an old thread, showing when the 10 posts were lost - in 2005. Before I was even a member or a moderator, and long before the changeover to Yuku. But no, k0nsl cannot admit that he made a mistake. And then he has the hypocrisy to demand that others' posts be deleted, while complaining that somehow we have apparently deleted his, when we have not.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#16	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1345 29-Apr-2008 13:10	Nick Terry: And then he has the hypocrisy to demand that others' posts be deleted, while complaining that somehow we have apparently deleted his, when we have not. Please note that you have already acknowledged that the administration of this forum has deleted, at least, ten posts for this writer -- that we know of. So in this case, and most probably in a lot of others, you contradicted yourself. Faithfully, "k0nsl" I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#17	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1346 29-Apr-2008 13:22	I also wonder what the reason is of the person you seem to admire who wrote that Stormfront is a "unsavoury" place. The question I ponder to myself is whether this is so because Stormfront , apparently, banned swastikas or if there is another underlining reason for this statement. It ought to be noted that I only linked and visited Stormfront because of their section devoted to the junk-story you value so dearly. In every case, it must be said again, linking to a web page which contains the link to a web page you dislike or disagree with, does not make that person a "Nazi". This should be elementary understanding - but with "holocaust"-propagandists, enforcers and intellectual-terrorists the logic is reversed. Faithfully, "k0nsl" I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#18	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6551 29-Apr-2008 14:08	k0nsl wrote: Nick Terry: And then he has the hypocrisy to demand that others' posts be deleted, while complaining that somehow we have apparently deleted his, when we have not. Please note that you have already acknowledged that the administration of this forum has deleted, at least, ten posts for this writer -- that we know of. So in this case, and most probably in a lot of others, you contradicted yourself. Faithfully, "k0nsl" Nope. 2008 is not 2005.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
nickterry		#19	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 6552 29-Apr-2008 14:10	k0nsl wrote: I also wonder what the reason is of the person you seem to admire who wrote that Stormfront is a "unsavoury" place. The question I ponder to myself is whether this is so because Stormfront , apparently, banned swastikas or if there is another underlining reason for this statement. It ought to be noted that I only linked and visited Stormfront because of their section devoted to the junk-story you value so dearly. In every case, it must be said again, linking to a web page which contains the link to a web page you dislike or disagree with, does not make that person a "Nazi". This should be elementary understanding - but with "holocaust"-propagandists, enforcers and intellectual-terrorists the logic is reversed. Faithfully, "k0nsl" carry on burbling to yourself. You've been trolled.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote
k0nsl		#20	[url]	[-]
Member Posts: 1348 29-Apr-2008 14:34	Hm. That is not even funny. -k0nsl I discovered the drama of the jews to be fantasy of the worst scenarios one could possibly imagine. They suffered less than any other people during the WWII epoch; yet they are the worst to kvetch and screech about luxurious compensation and "special treatment" in all areas of life in the name of a "holocaust" which never occurred. That is one reason why I have dedicated myself in setting the record straight and to actively combat their deceptive, wicked and destructive lies. Lieber ein Ende mit Schrecken als Schrecken ohne Ende.
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts Report Post	Reply Quote

Yuku free message boards

RODOH as defined by the Cesspit’s “Moderator”

RODOH as defined by the Cesspit’s “Moderator”

Quick Reply